cf. vsnet-alert 2115 http://vsnet.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp/vsnet/Mail/vsnet-alert/msg02115.html cf. vsnet-alert 2116 http://vsnet.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp/vsnet/Mail/vsnet-alert/msg02116.html cf. vsnet-alert 2120 http://vsnet.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp/vsnet/Mail/vsnet-alert/msg02120.html Dr. Kato wrote: > Considering there is also a suspect image (as pointed out by Yamaoka), >we should now call them > >J015114+360550 : original object (new Tri) >J015122+360323 : another one (pointed out by Yamaoka) J015122+360323 seems to be a fault of the film or the scan, as Mr. Suarez mentioned in [vsnet-alert 2115]: >> During the check of a271.gif, I was aware that the object at (300,178) >> is also absent in DSS image (and USNO, NED). What's that? No known >> comets and asteroids were there, also. > > That is clearly a negative fault. Indeed, J015122+360323 is not detected on Mr. Suarez's image on other days, and also not on Mr. Garradd's image [vsnet-alert 2116]. Sincerely Yours, Hitoshi YAMAOKA, Kyushu Univ., Japan yamaoka@rc.kyushu-u.ac.jp