(CCD image by G. Garradd)
Peter Williams in Sydney just phoned me to report a possible nova in Vela. I have made a confirmatory observation as follows:
May 22.423UT mag 3.0 May 22.435UT mag 3.0 2000 coords: 10h 44.7m -52d 23mHave a clear night and will keep on posting observations.
Regards
Andrew Pearce
Norwegian Astronomical Society - Variable Star Section POSSIBLE BRIGHT NOVA IN VELA This possible nova, located at R.A. = 10h44.7m, Decl. = -52o23' (2000.0), was first reported by A. Pearce [vsnet-alert 3008].
*** Latitudes of visibility ***
This object is currently visible from all of the Southern and parts of the Northern hemisphere. The table below shows the Northern latitude limits for the given dates (at 00h UT) and the critical elevations of the object when the Sun is 12 degrees below the free horizon (i.e. at the beginning of astronomical twilight).
Elevation May 22 May 30 Jun 7 Jun 15 Jun 23 Jul 1 o o o o o o 20 degrees 17.3 N 16.3 N 14.6 N 12.4 N 9.7 N 6.6 N 10 degrees 26.8 N 25.4 N 23.6 N 21.2 N 18.5 N 15.5 N 5 degrees 31.4 N 29.9 N 27.9 N 25.5 N 22.8 N 19.9 N --- Elongation 113.7 E 109.8 E 105.8 E 101.5 E 97.1 E 92.6 N
*** Chart of Nova Vel 1999 ***
A finder and sequence chart has been prepared and is available via the address http://www.astro.uio.no/~bgranslo/varchart.html. This chart is based on Hipparcos (HIP) and Tycho catalogues and contains V-magnitudes from HIP.
Yours sincerely, Bjorn H. Granslo
The probable nova discovered by Peter Williams would be the third known nova in Vela - and by far the brightest one. The two previous ones were CN Vel in 1905 (max 10.2p) and CQ Vel in 1940 (max 9.0p).
--------------------------------------------------------------
Here is a complete list of well-observed classical novae that got brighter than mag 3.5 at maximum.
V603 Aql 1918 -1.1v GK Per 1901 0.2v CP Pup 1942 0.5v RR Pic 1925 1.0v DQ Her 1934 1.3v V476 Cyg 1920 1.6v V1500 Cyg 1975 1.8V CP Lac 1936 2.1v CK Vul 1670 2.6v Q Cyg 1876 3.0v V446 Her 1960 3.0p V533 Her 1963 3.0p
--------------------------------------------------------------
And here is a list from the USNO-A2.0 catalog of those stars within 120" of the reported nova position and with b-r<1.3
RA Decl. Mag. Radius Angle hr mn sec dec mn sec Red Blue arcsec deg 10 44 31.231 -52 23 52.92 16.6 17.7 111.9 251.8 10 44 31.533 -52 21 56.82 15.9 17.0 114.8 291.9 10 44 32.023 -52 23 44.27 17.0 18.2 101.5 253.5 10 44 32.335 -52 22 38.97 16.8 17.7 91.0 278.2 10 44 32.783 -52 22 39.84 17.8 18.7 86.8 278.3 10 44 33.603 -52 23 39.65 16.1 17.0 86.5 252.5 10 44 33.738 -52 23 38.67 16.9 17.8 84.9 252.7 10 44 34.314 -52 22 53.84 15.7 16.8 70.6 273.1 10 44 35.415 -52 23 23.10 14.2 15.2 64.6 256.8 10 44 36.532 -52 22 36.81 11.3 12.4 55.2 285.8 10 44 38.132 -52 23 39.48 17.1 18.1 53.0 235.8 10 44 38.641 -52 21 18.32 16.2 17.3 106.2 333.6 10 44 39.513 -52 22 50.36 17.1 18.2 24.7 284.5 10 44 39.891 -52 21 53.67 17.5 18.7 69.1 334.5 10 44 40.694 -52 22 15.40 17.7 18.9 46.2 336.3 10 44 40.943 -52 24 29.09 17.8 19.0 89.6 190.1 10 44 42.182 -52 24 11.14 16.0 17.1 71.2 177.8 10 44 42.751 -52 21 02.33 17.4 18.3 117.9 5.5 10 44 42.988 -52 22 22.93 17.5 18.7 38.2 21.8 10 44 44.080 -52 24 45.85 16.6 17.7 107.5 163.6 10 44 44.967 -52 21 27.85 16.8 18.0 96.1 25.8 10 44 45.264 -52 21 45.07 17.5 18.7 80.7 33.2 10 44 45.388 -52 24 22.77 17.7 18.8 88.4 148.5 10 44 45.720 -52 24 24.91 17.3 18.0 91.5 146.7 10 44 46.349 -52 22 08.62 16.8 18.0 65.0 51.8 10 44 46.598 -52 23 45.62 15.0 16.2 62.1 123.5 10 44 47.656 -52 23 50.22 14.5 15.2 72.1 120.6 10 44 47.859 -52 23 54.10 16.1 17.1 76.2 121.6 10 44 48.433 -52 23 09.87 14.8 15.9 59.7 95.8 10 44 48.629 -52 21 59.40 17.0 18.1 85.8 58.7 10 44 50.499 -52 24 00.61 16.8 18.0 98.6 115.4 10 44 51.306 -52 23 51.03 17.5 18.7 99.3 110.1 10 44 53.376 -52 22 37.62 16.0 17.2 106.5 82.5 USNO-A2.0 magnitudes for GSC 8210.383: r= 12.7, b= 14.7
Regards,
Patrick
I have a preliminary, but more accurate position, from the Anglo-Australian Observatory (courtesy Peter Williams) for the nova of (J2000) 10h44m49.5s -52o25'35".
I don't know what sort of errors the above figures may have, but the nova appears to lie close to the easternmost of a pair of USNO-A2.0 stars. Its position is 10h44m49.10s -52o25'29.9" (R=16.6, B=17.8, V=17.1)
There is nothing precisely at the AAT position, so maybe this is the best candidate.
The other star mentioned above is slightly brighter (R = 16.4, B =16.4), with end figures 48.4s, 31.2"
Cheers,
Mati
According to the USNO-A2.0 catalog there is a blue mag 16.4 star only 3.0" from the position reported by Pam Kilmartin on IAUC 7176: R.A. 10h44m48.416s Decl. -52d25'31.23" (J2000.0) r= 16.4, b= 16.4 Looks like a very good candidate for the pre-nova. It is also the USNO-A2.0 star closest to the (probably less accurate) position reported by Andrew Pearce (cf. vsnet-alert 3019). The following star seems to be too far away (9.4" from Kilmartin's coordinates) and too red (b-r= 1.2): R.A. 10h44m49.095s Decl. -52d25'29.87" (J2000.0) r= 16.6, b= 17.8
Regards,
Patrick
Return to the Daisaku Nogami, Daisaku Nogami