[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]
[vsolj-alert 223] On pos SN NGC 925 (Yamaoka)
- Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 16:00:17 +0900 (JST)
- To: vsolj-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
- From: Taichi Kato <tkato@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
- Subject: [vsolj-alert 223] On pos SN NGC 925 (Yamaoka)
- Sender: owner-vsolj-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
From owner-vsnet-alert@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp Thu Dec 10 13:01 JST 1998
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 13:01:18 +0900 (JST)
From: Hitoshi YAMAOKA <yamaoka@rc.kyushu-u.ac.jp>
To: vsnet-alert@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp, isn_alert@mbox.queen.it
Cc: yamaoka@rcsvr.rc.kyushu-u.ac.jp
X-Distribute: distribute [version 2.1 (Alpha) patchlevel=24]
Subject: [vsnet-alert 2428] Re: Possible SN in NGC 925
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 679
Dear all,
>The SN is located roughly 4.2 arc minutes south and 2.3 arc minutes
>[7.7 seconds of time] west of the nucleus.
>The galaxy NGC 925 is 10.5 x 5.9 arc minutes in size and so the
>SN candidate is located within the galaxy proper, however, there
>is always the chance that it is a forground [galactic] variable
>that appears to be superimposed on the galaxy.
I guess that the reported position of suspected SN is well out of NGC
925, but it can be the outer region of the disk of it.
And, I wonder how did the reporter translate the arcminutes to seconds
of time. Is it correct?
Sincerely Yours,
Hitoshi Yamaoka, Kyushu Univ., Japan
yamaoka@rc.kyushu-u.ac.jp
Return to Daisaku Nogami
vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp