[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]
[vsnet-unknown 123] (fwd) re re MisV1147 Spectral Type
From: jg@jgws.freeisp.co.uk
Date: Sat, 07 Dec 2002 15:04:56 +0000
Subject: [vsnet-newvar 1715] re re MisV1147 Spectral Type
Doug West noted :-
> For observation number 1
> Q = (U-B)obs - 0.72*(B-V)obs = 0.087 - 0.72*(0.814) = -0.5
> Which equates to spectral type B4.5
>
> For observation number 2
> Q = (U-B)obs - 0.72*(B-V)obs = 0.044 - 0.72*(0.933) = -0.63
> Which equates to spectral type B2.5
Or B5 ish ;^)
Observation 1 at V = 13.4 and Observation 2 at V = 14.9 are more or less
max and min for this object.
Such a deep minimum for two stars in a binary of such equal type is
unlikely. Similarly the lightcurve would be expected to be quasi-EW not
quasi-EA if there were two B type stars orbiting each other. A B2.5
star, ostensibly brighter than a B4.5 one, causing an eclipse! ;^) This
argues against binarity then, at least in the context of photometrically
derived spectral class.
Anyway, as noted in the past by AH, the thing gets redder except for in
U-B during "light weakenings". Now, there is no qualitative difference
in B-V, V-Rc, Rc-Ic, B-Ic, but there is between U-B and any of these.
This is why you see diagnostic plots of groups of stars showing U-B
versus B-V, but none similar for anything like B-V versus V-Ic etc. In
fact, this goes all the way down to K. The next passband colours you'll
see plotted against each other in Johnson-Cousin's systems as being
qualitatively diagnostic are J-K versus K-L. I'm pretty sure the U-B
difference is because it is based around the Balmer Discontinuity, not
based on a continuum with a Wien's Law relationship like B-V, but have
no idea what is happening at the K / L "boundary". So the other colour
indices derivable here will add nothing.
I feel a forward scattering of U-B wavelengths (similar to what happens
in reflection nebulae) in tandem with normal reddening (de-blueing) in
B-Ic passbands may say something about the nature of the circumstellar
matter for this object (particle size, gas/dust ratio, etc), but I
cannot readily find _quantitative_ details on this topic.
It is certain that any optical polarimetric measure of this object would
be highly diagnostic. If it's a YSO Ae/Be star there'll be
polarisation. It's a bit faint for amateurs to manage this, even if
they had such a filter to hand. Polarisation during eclipse events
would be especially interesting with respect to the identity of the
eclipsor.
Cheers
John Greaves
Return to Daisaku Nogami
vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp