IR Gem preprint The following article is accepted for publication as IBVS No. 5122. The figures are available at: http://ftp.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp/pub/vsnet/preprints/IR_Gem/ Regards, Taichi Kato === \documentstyle[twoside,epsf]{article} \input{ibvs2.sty} \begin{document} \IBVShead{xxxx}{xx May 2001} \IBVStitletl{Observation of superhumps in IR Gem} \IBVSauth{Taichi~Kato$^1$} \vskip 5mm \IBVSinst{Dept. of Astronomy, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan, e-mail: tkato@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp} \IBVSobj{IR Gem} \IBVStyp{UGSU} \IBVSkey{dwarf nova, photometry} \begintext IR Gem is a well-known SU UMa-type dwarf nova. However, little observation of superhumps has been reported since the identification as an SU UMa-type dwarf nova (Szkody et al. 1984). We observed this star during its 1991 March superoutburst. \vskip 10mm The observations were done on two successive nights, 1991 March 18 and 19, using a CCD camera (Thomson TH~7882, 576 $\times$ 384 pixels, on-chip 3 $\times$ 3 binning adopted) attached to the Cassegrain focus of the 60 cm reflector (focal length=4.8 m) at Ouda Station, Kyoto University (Ohtani et al. 1992). An interference filter was used which had been designed to reproduce the $I_{\rm c}$ band. The exposure time was 10 s. The frames were first corrected for standard de-biasing and flat fielding, and were then processed by a microcomputer-based aperture photometry package developed by the author. The magnitudes of the object were determined relative to GSC 1905.753 (GSC magnitude 11.07), whose constancy during the run was confirmed using the check star USNO A1.0-1125.04589035. Barycentric corrections to observed times were applied before the following analysis. Table 1 lists the log of observations, together with nightly averaged magnitudes. \vskip 3mm \IBVSfig{10cm}{fig1.ps}{Light curve of the 1991 March superoutburst of IR Gem} Figure 1 shows the resultant light curve. Superhumps are prominently seen. After removing the trend of decline, we applied Phase Dispersion Minimization (PDM) method (Stellingwerf 1978). The resultant theta diagram is shown in Figure 2. The result generally confirms the superhump period of 0.07076 d reported by Szkody et al. (1984). The best period determined from our data is 0.07094$\pm$0.00006 d, which is slightly longer than that by Szkody et al. (1984). By taking the orbital period of 0.0684 d (Feinswog et al. 1988), the fractional superhump excess is 3.7\%. The most remarkable difference of superhumps from those observed by Szkody et al. (1984) is the clear presence of secondary superhumps, i.e. bump-like feature on the fading branch of superhumps. The feature was markedly seen on 1991 Mar 18, but became less clear on the subsequent night. This feature was discussed by Udalski (1990) on SU UMa itself. Udalski (1990) proposed that this feature may arise from a cooler component of the disk, but the nature is not still well understood. The appearance of secondary superhumps in $I_{\rm c}$ band light curve may be consistent with Udalski's (1990) hypothesis. \IBVSfig{10cm}{fig2.ps}{Period analysis of IR Gem} \begin{table} \begin{center} Table 1. Log of observations \\ \vspace{10pt} \begin{tabular}{ccccc} \hline start$^a$ & end$^a$ & mean mag$^b$ & error$^c$ & N$^d$ \\ \hline 48333.932 & 48334.084 & 2.234 & 0.002 & 760 \\ 48334.936 & 48335.115 & 2.420 & 0.002 & 816 \\ \hline \end{tabular} \end{center} \hskip 35mm $^a$ BJD$-$2400000 \hskip 35mm $^b$ Magnitude relative to GSC 1905.753 \hskip 35mm $^c$ Standard error of nightly average \hskip 35mm $^d$ Number of frames \end{table} \references Feinswog, L., Szkody, P., Garnavich, P., 1988, AJ, 96, 1702 Ohtani, H., Uesugi, A., Tomita, Y., Yoshida, M., Kosugi, G., Noumaru, J., Araya, S., Ohta, K. 1992, Memoirs of the Faculty of Science, Kyoto University, Series A of Physics, Astrophysics, Geophysics and Chemistry, 38, 167 Stellingwerf, R. F., 1978, ApJ, 224, 953 Szkody, P., Shafter, A. W., Cowley, A. P., 1984, ApJ, 282, 236 Udalski, A., 1990, AJ, 100, 226 \end{document}