From John Greaves: === > Again, UCAC is *not* a photometric catalog. Please don't > > make it something that it isn't, and don't complain. Others, such > > as TASS and ASAS, will contribute the photometric part of the picture. > who's complaining? I know it isn't a photometric catalogue Just as I know people will end up using it as such In fact, I've now found out they already are. Cheers John
vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp