>On vsnet-obs 45730 > This discordance is apparently one of the negative consequences of >AAVSO's method of CCD system specification. And why would that be? If it's V-filtered, he reported to AAVSO correctly; if it's unfiltered, it should have been reported as "CCD": Multi-letter Codes (Begin in column 38): CCD Charge-coupled device (unfiltered) CCDB Charge-coupled device (blue filter) CCDI Charge-coupled device (infrared filter) CCDO Charge-coupled device (orange filter) CCDR Charge-coupled device (red filter) CCDV Charge-coupled device (visual filter) The observer will have to clarify. Jim B.
vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp