[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]
[vsnet-obs 3168] July 18, CCD, JLT
- Date: Fri, 19 Jul 96 08:46:00 PDT
- To: VSNET-OBS <vsnet-obs@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
- From: "Lasse Teist Jensen, LTJ" <ltj@tt.dk>
- Subject: [vsnet-obs 3168] July 18, CCD, JLT
- Encoding: 48 TEXT
- Sender: owner-vsnet-obs@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
------------------------------------------------------
PHOTOMETRIC CCD OBSERVATIONS OF VARIABLE STARS
------------------------------------------------------
CENTER FOR BACKYARD ASTROPHYSICS (CBA) DENMARK
Observer : Lasse Teist Jensen
E-mail: ltj@tt.dk
Instruments: 0.25-m f/6.3 SCT , ST-6 SBIG CCD
Dear Colleagues,
Selected CCD results (poor weather most of the time, the last 30 minutes was
good):
EZ DEL 960718.037 <15.8
V337 CYG 960717.994 16.0::, I am still not sure I have the correct star.
V792 CYG 960717.997 <16.0
V1113 CYG 960718.025 <16.0
DM LYR 960718.022 15.56
V SGE 960718.020 12.80
V795 CYG 960717.973 <16.4
CG DRA 960718.031 16.5
KT PER 960718.016 12.9
LL LYR 960718.001 13.53
VAR 25 in Oph 960716.966 <17.1
Correction:
A few days ago I reported
VAR 25 in Oph 960715.940 16.2
Yesterday I got the vsnet chart of the area and it turns out that
the star I thought was Var 25 is the same as the star marked 16.41 on the
vsnet chart.
The odd thing is that this 16.41 star is not visible on a CCD image I got a
month ago.
The 16.41 star isn't visible on the image Vanmunster sent to vsnet some time
ago.
This tricked me. Sorry for the mistake.
Therefore
VAR 25 in Oph 960715.940 <17.1
So the conclusion is that the outburst had stopped the night July 15-16.
Regards
Lasse Teist Jensen (JLT)