[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

[vsnet-newvar 2144] (fwd) 1RXS_J231603.9-052713



  Do not use "AQR5".  The better formal name is 1RXS_J231603.9-052713.
(RXJ2316-0527 is a truncated name, not preferred either).

From: "B Monard" <bmonard@mweb.co.za>
Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2003 13:14:11 +0200
Subject: [vsnet-alert 7846] CCD observations follow-up

CCD observations of 6 September 2003
observer: Berto Monard  MLF, Pretoria, South Africa
Bronberg observatory / CBA Pretoria
location: -25 º 54' 48", 28º 26' 44"E, altitude 1590m
instrumentation: LX200 12" f/4.2 with ST-7E, unfiltered
conditions: moon


CENV1033   030906.695   165CR   MLF
NORIM   030906.700   171CR   MLF
TELQS   030906.713   155CR   MLF
1RXS_J231603.9-052713  030906.720   159CR   MLF   *

earlier observations:

1RXS_J231603.9-052713  030719.125   159CR   MLF
1RXS_J231603.9-052713  030826.880   162CR   MLF
1RXS_J231603.9-052713  030904.764   160CR   MLF

* According to the CV atlas, Aqr5 is 17.7B-  and described as a polar with
an orbital period of 0.1451day.
Observations so far at CBA Pretoria have seen magnitudes around 16CR.

Is Aqr5 in a high state since July (or earlier) 2003?
or
is this perhaps another mistaken red variable? The orbital period seems
unusually long for a polar?


Return to Home Page

Return to the Powerful Daisaku

vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Powered by ooruri technology