Doug West noted :- > For observation number 1 > Q = (U-B)obs - 0.72*(B-V)obs = 0.087 - 0.72*(0.814) = -0.5 > Which equates to spectral type B4.5 > > For observation number 2 > Q = (U-B)obs - 0.72*(B-V)obs = 0.044 - 0.72*(0.933) = -0.63 > Which equates to spectral type B2.5 Or B5 ish ;^) Observation 1 at V = 13.4 and Observation 2 at V = 14.9 are more or less max and min for this object. Such a deep minimum for two stars in a binary of such equal type is unlikely. Similarly the lightcurve would be expected to be quasi-EW not quasi-EA if there were two B type stars orbiting each other. A B2.5 star, ostensibly brighter than a B4.5 one, causing an eclipse! ;^) This argues against binarity then, at least in the context of photometrically derived spectral class. Anyway, as noted in the past by AH, the thing gets redder except for in U-B during "light weakenings". Now, there is no qualitative difference in B-V, V-Rc, Rc-Ic, B-Ic, but there is between U-B and any of these. This is why you see diagnostic plots of groups of stars showing U-B versus B-V, but none similar for anything like B-V versus V-Ic etc. In fact, this goes all the way down to K. The next passband colours you'll see plotted against each other in Johnson-Cousin's systems as being qualitatively diagnostic are J-K versus K-L. I'm pretty sure the U-B difference is because it is based around the Balmer Discontinuity, not based on a continuum with a Wien's Law relationship like B-V, but have no idea what is happening at the K / L "boundary". So the other colour indices derivable here will add nothing. I feel a forward scattering of U-B wavelengths (similar to what happens in reflection nebulae) in tandem with normal reddening (de-blueing) in B-Ic passbands may say something about the nature of the circumstellar matter for this object (particle size, gas/dust ratio, etc), but I cannot readily find _quantitative_ details on this topic. It is certain that any optical polarimetric measure of this object would be highly diagnostic. If it's a YSO Ae/Be star there'll be polarisation. It's a bit faint for amateurs to manage this, even if they had such a filter to hand. Polarisation during eclipse events would be especially interesting with respect to the identity of the eclipsor. Cheers John Greaves