Well, the limited number of archive images from the NOFS server (one E plate and one F plate in the red) certainly shows it to be variable. The sole near-red N plate shows it to be overexposed at those wavelengths. The sole J plate is not sufficiently close enough in epoch to the F plate to estimate even a crude colour index with confidence. Again, this ~ 11.5p near "maximum" object is flagged as completely overexposed in 2MASS. So no IR mag available, but this IR overexposure (J, H, Ks upper limit is usually around mag 6) for a faint star in itself suggests an infrared excess. An estimated "Tycho Blue" mag of 13.3 is given for a year 1892 image in AC2000.2. The interpretation of the AC photographic magnitudes into a Tycho blue system is not often very good, but the usual case is that the BT magnitude estimated for the AC objects ends up being a magnitude or two _too_ bright when the plate limit is approached (around BT 12 to 13). So a ~13p mag from AC data gives a suggestion of a faint event at that time too. Caught in fade so frequently by what are in effect very large spaced random samplings suggests that if it is an R CrB like object it is more akin to the DY Per / Z UMi "type" than the R CrB / SU Tau "type". Cheers John Taichi Kato wrote: > > HadV106: R CrB-like object?? > > YYYYMMDD(UT) mag observer > 19981108.433 113p (Katsumi Haseda) > 19990322.808 115p (Katsumi Haseda) ...