Arne opined: >Together with Brian Skiff's reference stars, you should >be able to calibrate the UCAC1 magnitudes for this field >well enough to serve as a sequence down to 16th magnitude >or so; an excellent stop-gap until someone gets >quality photometry for the field. >Arne An attempt at providing some UCAC1 magnitudes of this field for folk will be found at http://vsnet.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp/vsnet/Mail/vsnet-image/msg00037.html (the archive has a time lag compared to the email exploder, but it'll get there). Don't know whether it is any use, but it is the best I can manage. Cheers John