After a nagging suspiscion, I have double checked the B1900 positions of these objects HadV65 = GSC 5696 0165 is at 18h 34m 48s -10d 12' 57" B1900 whilst CSS 1064 [NSV 11168] is at 18h 34.4m -10d 13' B1900 the latter as given for object 53 of table 4 in Blanco and Nassau, ApJ 125, 408 [1957]. So those authors may in fact have mistakenly identified this object with BD -10 4748. Further, the NSV 11168 position then agrees exactly with the above CSS originally quoted position. So, just taking the original [objective prism measured] position of Blanco and Nassau as being out by 0.4 minutes of RA [&/or incorrectly transcribed : repeating two digits is a common transcription error, such that 34.8 could have easily been copied to 34.4] gives HadV65 = CCS 1064 = NSV 11168. [I think!!!]. John