[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]
[vsnet-newvar 387] Re: TmzV681 and V521 Cep
- Date: Tue, 2 May 2000 18:51:41 +0900 (JST)
- To: dubois@simbad.u-strasbg.fr, gerard@simbad.u-strasbg.fr, samus@sai.msu.ru, vsnet-newvar
- From: Taichi Kato <tkato>
- Subject: [vsnet-newvar 387] Re: TmzV681 and V521 Cep
- Cc: vsolj-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
- Sender: owner-vsnet-newvar@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Re: TmzV681 and V521 Cep
> I would like to discuss the case of Tmz V681 (vsnet-newvar No. 229, Feb.
> 23, 2000). You say that Tmz V681 is probably identical with LD 260 (named
> V521 Cep in the recent Namelist). This identity seems not the case,
> however. Tmz V681 is a GSC, IRAS, CCS star; LD 260 is a much fainter
> variable, with no GSC, IRAS, CCS identification. The finding chart
> published by Dahlmark in IBVS No. 4458 clearly shows that the two stars
> are different. Could you comment?
Yes, you are right. I thought the LD variable would be identical with
a brighter, prominent variable carbon star.
Regards,
Taichi Kato
Return to Daisaku Nogami
vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp