[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]
[vsnet-newvar 384] TmzV681 and LD260 (Samus)
- Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2000 23:19:17 +0900 (JST)
- To: vsnet-newvar, vsolj-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
- From: Taichi Kato <tkato>
- Subject: [vsnet-newvar 384] TmzV681 and LD260 (Samus)
- Sender: owner-vsnet-newvar@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
From samus@sai.msu.ru Thu Apr 27 21:10 JST 2000
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2000 16:10:03 +0400 (MSD)
From: "Nikolai N. Samus" <samus@sai.msu.ru>
To: "VSNET T. Kato" <tkato@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
Subject: Tmz V681 and V521 Cep
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Length: 495
Dear Dr. Kato,
I would like to discuss the case of Tmz V681 (vsnet-newvar No. 229, Feb.
23, 2000). You say that Tmz V681 is probably identical with LD 260 (named
V521 Cep in the recent Namelist). This identity seems not the case,
however. Tmz V681 is a GSC, IRAS, CCS star; LD 260 is a much fainter
variable, with no GSC, IRAS, CCS identification. The finding chart
published by Dahlmark in IBVS No. 4458 clearly shows that the two stars
are different. Could you comment?
Best regards
Kolya
Return to Daisaku Nogami
vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
VSNET Home Page