[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]
[vsnet-j 403] Re: Possible Nova in Pup
- Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2001 18:59:26 +0900 (JST)
- To: vsnet-alert, vsnet-campaign-nova
- From: Taichi Kato <tkato>
- Subject: [vsnet-j 403] Re: Possible Nova in Pup
- Cc: CBAT@CFA.HARVARD.EDU, GREEN@CFA.HARVARD.EDU, kazuyoshi.kanatsu@nifty.ne.jp, vsnet-j
- Sender: owner-vsnet-j@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Re: Possible Nova in Pup
> I'm not able to identify this star on USNO A2.0 (no entry like this around
> the suspetc position). As I said earlier, a good USNO A2.0 progenitor
> candidate (if this actually is a nova) is A0600.06937901; is, the entry
> above, related to a different USNO catalogue (A1.0, SA, AC2000...)? Please
> note also that there is some difference in coordinates between A0600.06937901
> (which I indicate to be the probable progenitor) and USNO0600.03989187. So,
> it could be interesting to know if the star reported by Dr. Kato comes from
> a different USNO catalogue. Maybe these stars are the same.
These stars are the same. I used USNO A1.0. If we adopt the USNO A2.0
magnitudes, the V-J color is even more bluer (closer to a slightly reddened
cataclysmic variable). I wonder how accurate A2.0 photometric calibration
in this field.
Regards,
Taichi Kato
PS. If this object is indeed a nova (I suspect so...), the proginitor is
one of the brightest ones in the recent dacades.