astro-ph でなく、hep-ph/0306140 にこんなのが出ています。つい興味深く読んで しまいました(^^;)。天文の方であまりに説が受け入れられなくなったので、 こっちの方で自説を展開するようになったのかな? 論文が却下された時の referee comment なども紹介されています(^^; #いや、この説はすでに社会学の領域で語られるようになったのか(^^; From: Alvaro De Rujula <alvaro@nxth04.cern.ch> Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 22:47:47 GMT (1016kb) Title: Gamma-ray bursts and the sociology of science Authors: A. De Rujula Comments: 16 pages, 8 figures. To be published in the Proceedings of the Neutrino Telescopes Workshop, Venice 2003 \\ I discuss what we have learned about Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) by studying their `afterglows', and how these are interpreted in the generally-accepted `fireball' model of GRBs, as well as in the generally-unaccepted `cannonball' model of the same phenomena. The interpretation of GRBs is a good example around which to frame a discussion of the different approaches to science found in various fields, such as high-energy physics (HEP), high-energy astrophysics, or even the deciphering of ancient languages. I use this example to draw conclusions on `post-academic' science, and on the current status of European HEP. \\ ( http://arXiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0306140 , 1016kb)

Return to the Powerful Daisaku Nogami
vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp