[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]
[vsnet-id 733] Re: (fwd) Re: [AAVSO-DIS] WW HYA
- Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 14:30:59 +0900 (JST)
- To: aavso-discussion@informer2.cis.McMaster.CA
- From: Taichi Kato <tkato@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
- Subject: [vsnet-id 733] Re: (fwd) Re: [AAVSO-DIS] WW HYA
- Cc: vsnet-id@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
- Delivered-To: vsnet-id-archive@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
- Delivered-To: vsnet-id@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
- Delivered-To: vsnet-id@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
- Sender: owner-vsnet-id@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Re: (fwd) Re: [AAVSO-DIS] WW HYA
> One of the problems with your listings is that nowhere do you actually
> say which of the many coordinates you show for an object is the preferred
> one. Also, you seem to using either old catalogues, or possibly the
> coordinates seem to be foro _B2000_, not J2000:
>
> ...so it looks as though you are using some 'unknown' version of the GSC
> (the original GSC v1.0?), and persist in using USNO-A1.0 even though it has
> been superceded _twice_, and possesses substantial systematic errors in
> the coordinates inherited from the GSC v1.1.
I didn't want to show the best astrometry, but simply to show the
identifications. Compared to the original 1 degree problem, subtle
differences between catalogs are not a problem. When the accuracy
is important, we insist on providing the best astrometric material,
as we have been doing with outbursting CV identifications.
For your information, I used GSC 1.1. I downloaded the catalog at
the epoch of the early release, so there may be a slight difference
from the final version.
Regards,
Taichi Kato
Return to Daisaku Nogami
vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp