[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

[vsnet-history 1325] SN 1993J (de Vaucouleurs)




Date: Thu, 12 Aug 93 17:34:49 CDT
From: gav@astro.as.utexas.edu (Gerard de Vaucouleurs)
Subject: SN93J

Dear Dr. Kato:
The following record in your latest listing should be deleted

1992.10.02 / 20.0 R / Humpreys, R. / KPNO 0.9-m, CCD / Nova

Dr. Humphreys informs me that she does not have an observation on that
date.  There must be confusion with the entry just above it (Salzer et
al.), to which the KPNO CCD reference must apply.

The spelling of her name should be corrected in the 1982 and 1985 entries
and she did not have a V plate in 1985 (this must have been deduced
from B and R by interpolation).  In 1982 the B and V magnitudes are for
March 21, the U and R for March 23.  The magnitudes themselves have
been revised also, but have not been released yet.  She and Dr. Richmond
are finishing a paper on the progenitor star in which they also revise
the other CCD data of Perelmuter, Magnier and others.  If and when
I have her permission to do so I will send you the revised values.

Mr. J.-C. Merlin has been able to revise his image-tube observations
of March 27.91, 1993.  In collaboration with Mr. Buil (of Toulouse,
France) they composited 3 pictures to reduce photographic noise and
lower the detection limit.  They now can see the 17.8 V mag star
25" N of the SN, but there is no trace of the SN itself.  Because
of the color sensitivity of the unfiltered image-tube and the
color difference between the read star and the presumably blue
fireball (if onset was before JD 074.4) one cannot conclude that
the SN was then fainter than 17.8, but it is most likely that
V > 17.0 is  a safe limit, possibly V > 17.5.  So the symbol
[16.0 in yur listing should be replaced at least by [17.0 (posibly
17.5) [corrections: your listing, ... possibly].
Mr. Merlin is now attempting to determine the color equation of
his unfiltered image-tube to refine the numbers above.

So we now know that onset was between JD74.4 and 74.8 (Neely's revised
data).  In fact I believe that to = JD74.5 +/- 0.05. 

With best regards,

G. de Vaucouleurs


Return to Home Page

Return to the Daisaku

vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Powered by ooruri technology