[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

[vsnet-history 1066] Re: confirmation nova (van Driel)

Date: Sun, 4 May 2003 15:50:18 +0900 (JST)
To: vsnet-history@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
From: Taichi Kato <tkato@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
Subject: [vsnet-history 1066] Re: confirmation nova (van Driel)
Delivered-To: vsnet-history-archive@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Delivered-To: vsnet-history@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Sender: owner-vsnet-history@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Date: Fri, 28 May 93 17:58:19 JST
From: Wim van Driel           <lvandri@c1.mtk.nao.ac.jp>
Subject: nova?

Dear Kato-san,

I saw an e-mail today saying the nova? corresponds to the actual
IRAS source, which is a variable. However, the object we saw
was rather 11 mag. in V than 15 or 17.
I do not think we will make more observations here.

Best,

Wim

Return to Home Page

Return to the Powerful Daisaku

vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Powered by ooruri technology

Prev by Message: [vsnet-history 1065] Re: confirmation nova (Kato to van Driel)
Next by Message: [vsnet-history 1067] VS observations (Schmeer)
Prev by thread: [vsnet-history 1065] Re: confirmation nova (Kato to van Driel)
Next by thread: [vsnet-history 1067] VS observations (Schmeer)
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread