[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

[vsnet-history 737] SN 1993J radio (Weiler)




Date: Thu, 15 Apr 93 17:08:56 EDT
From: Kurt w. Weiler <kweiler@shimmer.nrl.navy.mil>
Subject: SN1993J Radio Information Update


SN 1993J in NGC 3031

N. Panagia, Space Telescope Science Institute and University of
Catania; S. D. Van Dyk and K. W. Weiler, Naval Research Laboratory
report that the available radio observations of SN 1993J are already
sufficient for initial modelling of the progenitor star and projection
of the likely evolution of the radio emission.  Applying the Chevalier
mini-shell model which has been shown appropriate for other radio
supernovae (Weiler, et al. 1986, ApJ 301, 790) with the usual
assumptions for the stellar wind from the red supergiant progenitor
star and assigning a normal spectral index of -0.7 and an index for the
emission decay rate of -0.7, the model yields a presupernova mass loss
rate of about 2 x 10 ^-6 Msun/yr.  The stellar evolution models of
Maeder & Meynet (1988, A&AS, 76, 411) then imply a ZAMS mass
for the progenitor of SN1993J of <15 Msun.  Comparison with other
known radio supernovae, however, indicate that SN1993J is quite
similar in radio properties to SN1980K and SN1981K, and may
represent the lower end of the mass range of stars which can explode
as Type II supernovae.  This relative consistency of properties may
indicate a relatively firm lower limit to the radio properties of Type
II supernovae, and therefore a possible minimum distance indicator. 
Our modelling also results in predictions of the radio flux density to
be expected from SN1993J at various frequencies to assist planning
observations at other telescopes.  Taking 26 March 1993 as Day = 1,
the expected peak flux density at different radio frequencies is ~20
mJy on Day 20 (14 April) at 23 GHz, ~20 mJy on Day 25 (19 April)
at 15 GHz, ~25 mJy on Day 40 (4 May) at 8.4 GHz, ~30 mJy on Day
55 (19 May) at 5 GHz, and ~35 mJy on Day 130 (2 August) at 1.4
GHz.  After peak, the flux density at each frequency should decline
approximately as t^-0.7.


Return to Home Page

Return to the Powerful Daisaku

vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Powered by ooruri technology