[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]
[vsnet-grb 19] (fwd) BeppoSAX mail n.00/23 GRB000926: X-ray afterglow by BeppoSAX: revised
- Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2000 20:49:02 +0900 (JST)
- To: vsnet-grb
- From: Taichi Kato <tkato>
- Subject: [vsnet-grb 19] (fwd) BeppoSAX mail n.00/23 GRB000926: X-ray afterglow by BeppoSAX: revised
- Sender: owner-vsnet-grb@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
(fwd) BeppoSAX mail n.00/23 GRB000926: X-ray afterglow by BeppoSAX: revised
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2000 16:59:39 +0200 (DFT)
From: "Luigi Piro, BeppoSAX Mission Scientist" <piro@ias.rm.cnr.it>
Subject: [vsnet-alert 5305] BeppoSAX mail n.00/23 GRB000926: X-ray afterglow
by BeppoSAX: revised fluxes (fwd)
BeppoSAX mail n.00/23
L. Piro (BeppoSAX Mission Scientist, IAS/CNR Roma) & L. A. Antonelli (OaR)
report on behalf of the BeppoSAX team:
We have found an error in the application of a conversion factor which
underestimates the fluxes distributed in GCN n.832 & BeppoSAX mail n.00/22
The correct value of the average flux (at T=29.25) is
F(1.6-10 keV)= (2.6+\-0.6) 10^-13 erg/cm2/s
We have also carefully checked different background subtraction methods,
finding that the corresponding systematic effect amouts to less than about
15%. This has been included in the flux error quoted above.
All the other results on the fading behaviour and on the spectral
shape presented in GCN 832 remain unaffected.
vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp