[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

[vsnet-gcvs 372] AD Men identification



Subject: AD Men identification

  Originally Tom Richards had questioned about the identification of AD
Men on Apr. 6.

>The Downes catalog image of the same field shows a brighter star 13" from
>the one it identifies as AD Men, at p.a. 123d. It is not visible on my
>image. I wonder if that is AD Men, and Downes has mis-identified it?

  Today, Berto Monard noticed it independently.

>There is a star 0.2' ESE of AD Men, which seems to vary.  In the cv
>atlas it is shown bright, but on my 27 March image it is faint and on
>the 2 May image it is bright again. This variable is not in UCAC1.
>On those dates AD Men itself (at the cv atlas position) was 16.7 and
>16.9CR respectively on my images.

  I have examined the DSS images and found that the ESE star was
caught in outburst in the plate taken on 1987 Nov. 28 (R-band) but dim
on the plates of other epochs.  The object marked on VSNET
page/Downes' chart (at the nominal position of AD Men: 06:04:28.60,
-71:25:15.6) differs from this outburst object.  

Outbursting object on 1987 Nov.;

GSC2.2    06:04:30.836 -71:25:22.25 F=14.80(!) J=18.71
USNO-A2.0 06:04:30.845 -71:25:22.28 r=17.0 b=18.3
= 2RXP J060431.1-712523
(no 2MASS counterpart)

The marked object:

GSC2.2    06:04:28.526 -71:25:15.26 F=16.62 J=17.66
USNO-A2.0 06:04:28.514 -71:25:15.38 r=16.3 b=17.3
2MASS     06:04:28.69  -71:25:15.4  J=15.333 H=14.923 K=15.036

  The error circle of X-ray source [HP99] 1272 ( 06:04:30.6 -71:25:29
unc=22" ) contains these two stars, but the former is nearer.

  Zwitter and Murani 1995, A&AS, 114, 575 reported a spectrum of "AD
Men" at 06:04:28.78, -71:25:56.4 (J2000.0).  It was B ~ 14.5, so they
thought it to be at outburst.  The spectrum shows a blue continuum
with hydrogen Balmer absorption lines.  But this position is almost
identical to the GSC 9172.887 (also cataloged in UCAC1, 2MASS,
USNO-A2.0/B1.0, and GSC 2.2).  They seem to have observed yet another
star about 40" south of the nominal position of AD Men.

  Though I cannot access the discovery literature (Hodge and Wright,
1967, "The Large Magellanic Cloud"), I am quite certain that the
first star (06:04:30.836 -71:25:22.25) is true "AD Men".  The marked
object in VSNET page or Downes' online chart shows no significant
change among the DSS images, though a slight change is noted by Berto.

Sincerely Yours,
Hitoshi Yamaoka, Kyushu Univ., Japan
yamaoka@rc.kyushu-u.ac.jp


Return to Home Page

Return to the Daisaku Nogami

vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Powered by ooruri technology