[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]
[vsnet-gcvs 65] Re: re HadV81 &/or NSV 11337
- Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 14:26:33 +0900 (JST)
- To: vsnet-gcvs, vsnet-id, vsnet-newvar
- From: Taichi Kato <tkato>
- Subject: [vsnet-gcvs 65] Re: re HadV81 &/or NSV 11337
- Sender: owner-vsnet-gcvs@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Re: re HadV81 &/or NSV 11337
> Though not a common occurrence, as I say, I've seen an instance or two, so
> I'd suggest this as an automatic test for all "new" variables that are
> found mostly due east of an NSV object, especially if that value is near 50
> or 75 years worth of RA precession [ie, the original position was quoted as
> 1900 or 1875 respectively, but was unfortunately catalogued as 1950 in the
> original CVS or wherever, whilst not having actually being converted to said].
Returning to the original reference (Luyten, NSV11337 = AN 934.1936,
thanks to Yamaoka-san to find this identification), the situation has become
even more complex. The literature gives the following coordinates.
18h 39.5m -24o 15' (1875.0)
18 41.1 -24 14 (1900.0)
The 1875.0 position looks more original, probably based on Cordova
Durchmusterung. However, the precession from 1875.0 to 1900.0 makes
a diffference from the quoted value. The 1875.0 position is more distant
from the HadV81 position.
Regards,
Taichi Kato
vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Return to Daisaku Nogami
vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp