My apologies. In my haste I made a mistake generating the ephemeris for the 0.89 day period. Mike Linnolt's observation of an eclipse is consistent with the 0.89 day period. The 1.02 day period is most likely eliminated and the 1.43 day period is looking unlikely. The correct ephemeris follows... Cheers, Chris Ephemeris for TmzV772 To=2449687.2960 + 0.89629700xE JD Year Mo Date UT Min Cycle 2452777.7281 2003 5 18.2281 5:28 I 3448 2452778.6244 2003 5 19.1244 2:59 I 3449 2452779.5207 2003 5 20.0207 0:29 I 3450 2452780.4169 2003 5 20.9169 22: 0 I 3451 2452781.3132 2003 5 21.8132 19:31 I 3452 2452782.2095 2003 5 22.7095 17: 1 I 3453 2452783.1058 2003 5 23.6058 14:32 I 3454 2452784.0021 2003 5 24.5021 12: 3 I 3455 2452784.8984 2003 5 25.3984 9:33 I 3456 2452785.7947 2003 5 26.2947 7: 4 I 3457 2452786.6910 2003 5 27.1910 4:35 I 3458 2452787.5873 2003 5 28.0873 2: 5 I 3459 2452788.4836 2003 5 28.9836 23:36 I 3460 2452789.3799 2003 5 29.8799 21: 7 I 3461 2452790.2762 2003 5 30.7762 18:37 I 3462 2452791.1725 2003 5 31.6725 16: 8 I 3463
vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp