My apologies. In my haste I made a mistake generating the ephemeris for
the 0.89 day period. Mike Linnolt's observation of an eclipse is
consistent with the 0.89 day period. The 1.02 day period is most likely
eliminated and the 1.43 day period is looking unlikely. The correct
ephemeris follows...
Cheers,
Chris
Ephemeris for TmzV772 To=2449687.2960 + 0.89629700xE
JD Year Mo Date UT Min Cycle
2452777.7281 2003 5 18.2281 5:28 I 3448
2452778.6244 2003 5 19.1244 2:59 I 3449
2452779.5207 2003 5 20.0207 0:29 I 3450
2452780.4169 2003 5 20.9169 22: 0 I 3451
2452781.3132 2003 5 21.8132 19:31 I 3452
2452782.2095 2003 5 22.7095 17: 1 I 3453
2452783.1058 2003 5 23.6058 14:32 I 3454
2452784.0021 2003 5 24.5021 12: 3 I 3455
2452784.8984 2003 5 25.3984 9:33 I 3456
2452785.7947 2003 5 26.2947 7: 4 I 3457
2452786.6910 2003 5 27.1910 4:35 I 3458
2452787.5873 2003 5 28.0873 2: 5 I 3459
2452788.4836 2003 5 28.9836 23:36 I 3460
2452789.3799 2003 5 29.8799 21: 7 I 3461
2452790.2762 2003 5 30.7762 18:37 I 3462
2452791.1725 2003 5 31.6725 16: 8 I 3463
vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp