[vsnet-const 11] RE: V449 Sco

[Sebasti若n Otero <varsao@fullzero.com.ar>]

Chris and John:
                            I agree with the star being not a variable. I
think 10 random observations at 7.0 is too much of a coincidence. Anyway
I'll be keeping an eye on it until the end of the season.

Best regards,
Sebasti睹.


----- Original Message -----
From: John Isles <jisles@voyager.net>
To: Chris Lloyd <cl@astro1.bnsc.rl.ac.uk>
Cc: Sebasti睹 Otero <varsao@fullzero.com.ar>;
<vsnet-const@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp>; Fraser Farrell
<fraser@trilobytes.com.au>; Jaime Garc <icoper@satlink.com>
Sent: Friday, July 14, 2000 9:48 AM
Subject: [vsnet-const 10] Re: V449 Sco


> Thanks, Chris.  I wasn't convinced the star was variable.  My outlying
> observations could have been due to misidentification of the variable or
> comparison stars in a crowded field.  One would need harder evidence to
> conclude the star is variable.
>
> Best wishes -- John.
>
> Chris Lloyd wrote:
> >
> > I'm sorry to be the bringer of bad news but I can find no believable
> > periodic variation in V449 Sco.
> > <snip>

VSNET Home Page

---

vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp