Return to Home Page
The UCAC CCD has significant CTE problems, which they correct for astrometry but which undoubtedly contribute to photometric errors. They use a Gaussian fit to the image profile rather than aperture photometry, though they attempt to do an empirical magnitude-dependent correction. The UCAC1 paper (Zacharias, et al. 2000, AJ 120, 2131) indicates that no flatfielding was applied for UCAC1. Combine this with the narrow bandpass, different from either V or Rc, and the fact that fainter stars are systematically redder, and I could believe photometric deviations from some V or Rc catalog both at the faint end and with position on the CCD. Again, UCAC is *not* a photometric catalog. Please don't make it something that it isn't, and don't complain. Others, such as TASS and ASAS, will contribute the photometric part of the picture. Arne
Return to the Daisaku
vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
