[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]
[vsnet-chat 5973] Re: [AAVSO-DIS] Eta Gem Request & other LP EBs
- Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 10:12:00 +0900 (JST)
- To: aavso-discussion@informer2.cis.McMaster.CA,vsnet-chat@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
- From: Taichi Kato <tkato@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
- Subject: [vsnet-chat 5973] Re: [AAVSO-DIS] Eta Gem Request & other LP EBs
- Cc: vsnet-campaign-ecl@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp,vsnet-ecl@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
- Delivered-To: vsnet-chat-archive@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
- Delivered-To: vsnet-chat@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
- Sender: owner-vsnet-chat@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Re: [AAVSO-DIS] Eta Gem Request & other LP EBs
> There are a few shallow depth, long-period EBs that come due in the next
> year or so. It would be nice if a better ephereris for all these stars was
> available. Besides eta Gem, I show the following stars eclipsing based on
> periods and dates from Burnham's Celestial Handbook.
>
> 32 Cyg (per = 1148d) mid-eclipse April 1, 2003
> 31 Cyg (per = 3802.84d) mid-eclipse Sept 3, 2003
> zeta Aur (per = 972.176d) begins Nov 13, 2003, ends Dec 18, 2003
>
> All these eclipses last a long while - weeks or months around their mid
> dates, so good monitoring needs to happen well beforehand. The visual dips
> are also very small - only a few 10th of a mag in 'v'. They are thus for
> CCD guys, best in redder bands.
They are all zeta Aur-type ecliping binaries. In these systems, a hot
star (usually main-sequence B star) is eclipsed by a (super)giant (usually
K star). So the depths of eclipses are larger in short wavelengths.
The depths are much more striking in the B band (good targets for B-filtered
human eyes?, although I don't recommend to use a U filter...) rather than
in red CCD bands.
Regards,
Taichi Kato
Return to Daisaku Nogami
vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp