Dear all, > As I said Sebastian check a big amount file from night > 8/9 January and reejected some variables. Strange he > observed that errors linear changing from -0.3 mag at > 5 mag to 0 mag at 7.3-7.8 mag and >+0.4 at >9 mag, Maybe > we can apply some corrections to to my Survey values ;) > But Sebastian must write about this conclusions itself. Yes, it was surprising to find a relation between V magnitude measured and actual V magnitude of the star. And also interesting that there is no color-dependence in this relation. I won't try to explain it (maybe some of you can do it), but only show the numbers: This relation can be at first look be expressed by this table: (Vm= V mag. measured) Vm Vm-V Brighter than 4.8 -0.25 4.8 - 6.0 -0.2 6.0 - 6.8 -0.15 6.8 - 7.2 -0.1 7.2 - 7.5 -0.05 7.5 - 7.8 0 7.8 - 8.0 +0.05 8.0 - 8.2 +0.1 8.2 - 8.3 +0.15 8.3 - 8.4 +0.2 8.4 - 8.5 +0.25 8.5 - 8.65 +0.3 8.65 - 8.8 +0.35 8.8 - 9.0 +0.4 <9.0 >+0.45 Beyond 9.0 it all gets very noisy and useless. Corrections and wrong ID's have been sent to Maciej for his use. I think it would be a ggod idea to make a filtering by magnitude. It would help the identification and solve most of the wrong ID's to put a limitting magnitude to the survey. For instance if no star fainter than 9.0 mag. is included , there wouldn't be dozens of stars of mag. 14, 15, 16. misidetified with 5th or 6th mag. stars nearby....;-(( The Orion Nebula and its faint flare stars is a annyong example on "how to kill visual observers@!" Cheers, Sebastian. --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://vsnet.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.423 / Virus Database: 238 - Release Date: 25/11/02