[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]
[vsnet-chat 5831] Re: ResSkySurvey and PIXY
- Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2003 17:00:08 +0900 (JST)
- To: vsnet-chat@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
- From: Taichi Kato <tkato@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
- Subject: [vsnet-chat 5831] Re: ResSkySurvey and PIXY
- Delivered-To: vsnet-chat-archive@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
- Delivered-To: vsnet-chat@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
- Sender: owner-vsnet-chat@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Re: [vsnet-chat 5824] Re: ResSkySurvey and PIXY
> I delete some bright variables as Alpha Ori, Beta.. brighter
> than 2 mag due a saturation.
Did PIXY report on NSV17174? Or did you manually deleted the data?
> The values looks for me not
> accurate to reported. Have a right?
I have heard in the past that PIXY somehow compensates saturation
and produces some reasonable values even for saturated objects.
(And PIXY can measure even non-linear conversions like GIF, JPEG, scanned
photographs and others). This was the advantage of PIXY what I heard from
Yoshida-san, but may not apply to the present version.
Regards,
Taichi Kato
Return to Daisaku Nogami
vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp