[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]
[vsnet-chat 5676] Re: B-V question
- Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2002 20:58:53 -0700 (MST)
- To: awerven@broward.edu
- From: Brian Skiff <Brian.Skiff@lowell.edu>
- Subject: [vsnet-chat 5676] Re: B-V question
- Cc: vsnet-chat@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
- Delivered-To: vsnet-chat@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
- Sender: owner-vsnet-chat@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
You can get fairly good V-R from B-V for stars of ordinary color.
A pretty good transformation is: V-R = 0.508(B-V) = 0.040 which is
very good in the range 0.3 < B-V < 0.9, and goodo enough bluer than this,
and out to about B-V = 1.2.
>> should I use Guide 7 magnitudes or is it better to use the values
>> that Simbad returns.
If the SIMBAD values are from "real" photoelectric or CCD
photometry, then this will generally be preferable.
>> differential photometry of a eclipsing binary in V, R, and I...
One might ask _why_ all three colors rather than just, say, V and I
or V and R. If it's to get some temperature information about the
components of the binary, then using V-I will give you the best baseline
(and R or V-R will be superfluous).
Is there previous photometry of the binary you are interested in?
If so, it could be that someone has calibrated some nearby comparison
stars. Also, have a look at this big photometric reference file:
http://ftp.lowell.edu/pub/bas/starcats/loneos.phot
...to see if there happen to be some stars near your target.
Hope this helps.
\Brian
Return to Daisaku Nogami
vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp