Dear Dr. Brian Skiff, Thank you for your comment. > One wonders whether there has been some confusion with nearby > UZ And, similarly-bright red star within 1 arcminute. A look in VizieR > suggests it is the only red star in the field. Here are the data of these two variables. UZ And 01h16m11s.16 +41o44'58".3 Mag(max):9.1 Mag(min):15.6 MagSystem:V Type:M Spectrum:M7e-M9e Epoch:42663 Period:314.30 EK And 01h16m13s.50 +41o44'22".5 Mag(max):10.3 Mag(min):11.4 MagSystem:V Type:SRA Spectrum:M2 Epoch:19818 Period:185 MISAO's unfiltered CCD (KAF) observations are between 10.47 and 10.64 mag. It is only 0.8 mag brighter than visual observations, which also supports that EK And is not a red variable. So maybe the discoverer of EK And misidentified the star with UZ And in some cases, and EK And is constant in fact. But I do not know how the spectrum, epoch and period of EK And was determined... Best regards, -- Seiichi Yoshida comet@aerith.net http://vsnet.aerith.net/