[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]
[vsnet-chat 5439] Re: [vsnet-id 686] Re: Precise position of TZ Vel
- Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2002 13:50:38 +1000
- To: <vsnet-id@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp>, <vsnet-chat@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
- From: "Mati Morel" <morel@ozemail.com.au>
- Subject: [vsnet-chat 5439] Re: [vsnet-id 686] Re: Precise position of TZ Vel
- References: <200208060250.g762oGSc001903@maple.hill.lowellnet>
- Sender: owner-vsnet-chat@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
----- Original Message -----
From: "Brian Skiff" <Brian.Skiff@lowell.edu>
To: <morel@ozemail.com.au>
Cc: <samus@sai.msu.ru>; <vello@pcug.org.au>;
<vsnet-id@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2002 12:50 PM
Subject: [vsnet-id 686] Re: [vsnet-chat 5437] Precise position of TZ Vel
> It looks to me as though Mati got things slightly garbled. The
> red variable is unamibguously GSC 8584-1180. The position he gave is for
> a faint companion 8" northwest of the much brighter red star. The best
> position is from UCAC1:
>
> TZ Velorum 9 30 27.59 -53 08 49.3 (2000)
I. agree.
> The star appears in many catalogues back to the AC, where it was recorded
> in 1894. Among the aliases:
>
> GSC 8584-1180 = IRAS 09287-5255 = MSX5C G275.4660-01.3474
I initially also thought this GSC star could be TZ, but I rejected it in
favour of another star 3.3" NW
(r = 8.6, b=13.3, V =10.4 at 9:30:27.35 -53:8:47.2 in USNO-A2.0). Looking
at the r and b mags, this star was simply SCREAMING out for recognition, and
I found it impossible to ignore. In hindsight it looks like the r mag. has
been horribly contaminated, but at the time would not have suspected that.
I think now that both the astrometry and photometry are a bit off
Evidently a case of the photometry being wildly skewed by a companion,
believe it or not?
Regards,
Mati
morel@ozemail.com.au
Return to Daisaku Nogami
vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp