[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]
[vsnet-chat 5348] Re: On UY Cen fading
- Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 01:34:26 -0300
- To: <pfwilliams@onaustralia.com.au>, "Taichi Kato" <tkato@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp>, <vsnet-campaign-rcb@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp>, <vsnet-chat@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp>, <vsnet-rcb@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
- From: "Sebastian Otero" <varsao@fullzero.com.ar>
- Subject: [vsnet-chat 5348] Re: On UY Cen fading
- Cc: <vsnet-gcvs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
- References: <200206100655.PAA00726@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
- Sender: owner-vsnet-chat@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
> On UY Cen fading
>
> According to BAA VSS Circular 112, 3 (J. Toone), UY Cen is reported to
> have undergone a deep minimum (mag 10) in 2002 February to March. Such
> a deep fading may have been compared to a RCB-type fading.
In no way...
I am sure we are dealing again with different color response and observing
technics.
A proof of that is the comparison between Peter Williams' observations and
mine.
There is approximately a 1.3 mag. difference for a given time. There is also
some scatter due to the difficult task that is to estimate such a red star
(B-V 2.7 - 3.5). But this huge difference is for sure the source of the
discrepant comments.
The star is ACTUALLY very dim comparing with previous activity (as Colin
reported).
The GCVS lists a range 9.22 - 11.2 in B.
We know its color index so it means more or less 6.5 - 7.7 in V.
And recently it has been much fainter than that, it's true.
But I can't see any similarity with an RCB event.
The event is more likely similar to that of L2 Puppis in the last couple of
years: its mean magnitude has been fainter than the catalogued values. L2
Puppis got as faint as 7.0 (0.8 mag. fainter than "official") and this one
may have done such a thing in a more important fashion.
Future monitoring will reveal it but -although faint- the star's behaviour
has nothing strange. It is very stable around 8.5 - 9.1.
> Colin Henshaw (BAA VSS) in February 2002 that UY Cen was the faintest he
> had seen in many years.
Maybe Colin can inform us WHEN this low state started.
Peter asked:
> Perhaps the difference in reported magnitudes relates to resolution of the
> companion star or a different comparison sequence?
I used a 8" and the star is correctly identified.
The cause arises in the deep red color as mentioned before.
Sequences (specially if they are V based) can not account for such a
difference.
Check my chart of UY Centauri at:
http://ar.geocities.com/varsao/Carta_UY_Cen.htm
And this is a comparison between Peter observations and mine:
http://ar.geocities.com/varsao/Curva_UY_Centauri.htm
You can see our different color response there.
Regards,
Sebastian.
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://vsnet.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.365 / Virus Database: 202 - Release Date: 25/05/02
Return to Daisaku Nogami
vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp