[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]
[vsnet-chat 5178] Re: Curious observations
- Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 12:48:45 +0100 (CET)
- To: Roger Pickard <rdp@star.ukc.ac.uk>
- From: Petr Sobotka <sobotka@monoceros.physics.muni.cz>
- Subject: [vsnet-chat 5178] Re: Curious observations
- cc: vsnet-chat@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
- In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10202281133300.6910-100000@star>
- Sender: owner-vsnet-chat@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
I agree with Roger. It is very important to collect full
estimates! Another way is to provide to observers some software. We have
in the MEDUZA such software MedDat - observer only type name of the star
(for example): AY Dra, time: 21:15 and estimate F4V1G and all other
calculations are done automatically. So, JD and MAG are correct.
Best regards
Petr Sobotka
On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Roger Pickard wrote:
> It is probably worth reiterating that the BAA VSS avoids many of these
> problems by insisting that the observer report the _full_ estimate with
> their observations. This way, a cross check is automatically undertaken
> by the data processing software and the observer can be contacted
> immediately should any queries arise.
> I'm sure that if more organisations adopted this approach there would be
> fewer errors in the various databases and therefore they would be of
> higher quality and of even more use to those undertaking analysis.
> -----
> Roger Pickard,
> Director, BAA Variable Star Section,
> E-mail: rdp@star.ukc.ac.uk
> BAA VSS Web Page: www.britastro.org/vss
>
>
>
Return to Daisaku Nogami
vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp