[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]
[vsnet-chat 5163] Re: About courios observation, big confusion
- Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 13:48:29 +0900 (JST)
- To: vsnet-chat@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
- From: Taichi Kato <tkato@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
- Subject: [vsnet-chat 5163] Re: About courios observation, big confusion
- Sender: owner-vsnet-chat@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Re: [vsnet-chat 5158] About courios observation, big confusion
Another point of this curious observation:
> fainter then magMin 10.5 p of HYAFH and brigther then 12.2 of GSC4900:329.
> If need I will send the images.
>
> On the other hand, on images, the star appear of orange coulor and
> comparison with the near star
> GSC 4900:477 9.8/0.4 and GSC 4900:491 10.3/0.4, the different magnitude is
> well visible.
But I wonder how the range of 10.0-10.5p was estimated (by the discoverer
Hoffmeister)? These photographic magnitudes look too bright for this
red variable...? Did Hoffmeister use compariosn stars in "old-scale"
visual magntudes in the BD catalog in estimating photograhpic magnitudes??
Regards,
Taichi Kato
Return to Daisaku Nogami
vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp