[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]
[vsnet-chat 5113] Re: [vsnet-obs 38590] Observations of 02/21/2002
- Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 18:18:59 +0900 (JST)
- To: vsnet-chat@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp, vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
- From: Taichi Kato <tkato@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
- Subject: [vsnet-chat 5113] Re: [vsnet-obs 38590] Observations of 02/21/2002
- Cc: jripero@wanadoo.es
- Sender: owner-vsnet-chat@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Re: [vsnet-obs 38590] Observations of 02/21/2002
> Dear Jose,
>
> Are you sure about the following observations you reported in vsnet-obs
> 38590?
>
>
> > GEMU 020221.9514 11.2 IN OUTBURST !
> > CNCSY 020221.9521 11.9 IN OUTBURST !
> > CVNCSY 020221.9528 12.6
> >
>
> Observers worldwide reported fainter magnitudes of U Gem already
> yesterday (around 13.0) and this night I observed this star at 13.5.
> I observed SY Cnc a few hours later then you did, but I saw no outburst.
> I observed this star at 13.6.
Well, no surprise.. This is clearly another instance of "Ripero Delay".
One may have noticed that decay (or sometime rise) of dwarf nova outbursts
sometimes experiences significant delays in Ripero's observations.
People call it "Ripero Delay"...
Another example (recent IR Gem outburst):
YYYYMMDD(UT) mag observer
20020213.882 121 (Maciej Reszelski)
20020213.885 126 (Gary Poyner)
20020214.466 <140 (Peter Nelson)
20020214.849 137 (Eddy Muyllaert)
20020214.910 126 (Jose Ripero) ***
20020215.820 127 (Jose Ripero) ***
20020215.864 <142 (Eddy Muyllaert)
20020215.885 140 (Maciej Reszelski)
20020216.815 <136 (Jose Ripero)
20020216.842 <142 (Eddy Muyllaert)
20020216.850 158: (Maciej Reszelski)
20020216.917 <138 (A. Sucker)
20020217.823 <136 (Jose Ripero)
20020217.835 <142 (Eddy Muyllaert)
20020217.849 <153 (Maciej Reszelski)
20020218.203 <145 (Mike Simonsen)
20020218.819 <142 (Eddy Muyllaert)
SY Cnc:
YYYYMMDD(UT) mag observer
20020202.255 108 (Mike Simonsen)
20020202.867 116 (Georg Comello)
20020202.873 112 (Eddy Muyllaert)
20020202.887 107 (Pavol A. Dubovsky)
20020202.919 114 (Michel Verdenet)
20020202.937 112 (Wolfgang Kriebel)
20020202.971 118 (Maciej Reszelski)
20020203.867 112 (Pavol A. Dubovsky)
20020203.942 112 (Eddy Muyllaert)
20020204.828 114 (Pavol A. Dubovsky)
20020204.951 113 (Jean Gunther)
20020204.981 112 (Maciej Reszelski)
20020205.160 111 (Erwin van Ballegoij)
20020205.858 113 (Pavol A. Dubovsky)
20020205.872 114 (Eddy Muyllaert)
20020205.938 115 (Jose Ripero)
20020205.982 111 (Hazel McGee)
20020206.942 116 (Gary Poyner)
20020207.047 116 (Erwin van Ballegoij)
20020208.026 118 (Erwin van Ballegoij)
20020208.219 115 (Mike Simonsen)
20020208.867 115 (Eddy Muyllaert)
20020209.842 123 (Georg Comello)
20020209.917 119 (Eddy Muyllaert)
20020210.017 119 (Erwin van Ballegoij)
20020210.890 118 (Bjorn H. Granslo)
20020212.876 131 (Georg Comello)
20020213.823 134 (Georg Comello)
20020213.837 127 (Maciej Reszelski)
20020213.891 133 (Gary Poyner)
20020213.969 131 (Adrian Sonka Bruno)
20020214.848 137 (Georg Comello)
20020214.858 135 (Eddy Muyllaert)
20020214.938 113 (Jose Ripero) ***
20020215.798 135 (Georg Comello)
20020215.869 123 (Jose Ripero)
20020215.872 135 (Eddy Muyllaert)
...
Close examination of every dwarf nova light curve can often reveal one
or two instances.
Regards,
Taichi Kato
Return to Daisaku Nogami
vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp