Berto Monard wrote: >A real pity that Arne's telescope will scratch some part of >the structure when trying to measure this field... The 1.0m has a hard limit around -31Dec, and a soft limit at -27.5Dec. I will on occasion override the soft limit when an important observation is to be made, but never override the hard limit. This is an old telescope with lots of mercury around, and you don't want to push anything outside of its normal operating conditions. In addition, -30Dec is at airmass 2.7 when transiting at Flagstaff. This is again into a questionable range when trying to determine extinction and second-order color effects. I don't trust my photometry very well for such observations! It is far better if someone in the southern hemisphere took up the challenge to obtain field photometry for fields south of, say, -25Dec. I'm surprised that Kilmarten et al. haven't published any comparison stars for the recent southern novae; they certainly have been obtaining filtered photometry. Arne