[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]
[vsnet-chat 4615] Re: V589 Her
- Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 08:06:21 -0700
- To: vsnet-alert@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
- From: aah@nofs.navy.mil
- Subject: [vsnet-chat 4615] Re: V589 Her
- Cc: vsnet-chat@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
- Sender: owner-vsnet-chat@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Gianluca posted his astrometry from his images of
the outburst; Yamaoka-san posted his astrometry from
the same images. They differ slightly, due to the
different reference catalogs and reduction procedures,
but both are within their errors (I assume anyway;
Yamaoka did not give any errors for his reductions;
I would not believe the extra digit of precision until
I saw formal errors). I don't think there is any relevance
to Gianluca's measurement being closer to the blue USNO-A star's
reported position.
Note that both of these positions match within
error to the one shown in Bruce Sumner's sequence
(from my .dat file; USNO-A2.0, 0.1arcsec internal
precision, posted May 9):
http://ftp.nofs.navy.mil/pub/outgoing/aah/sequence/sumner/v589her.seq
16 22 07.15 +19 22 37.2 Gianluca
16:22:07.164 +19:22:36.91 Yamaoka
16 22 07.17 +19 22 37.1 Henden
16 22 07.15 +19 22 37.4 USNO-A blue star
It is nice to see agreement! This is obviously not a high
proper motion star. Since Yamaoka-san notes a fainter companion,
you should be careful on your photometry as the CV fades.
I've copied this to -chat as continued discussion of
the position is probably not relevant to -alert.
Arne
Return to Daisaku Nogami
vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp