[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]
[vsnet-chat 3886] Info on a LMC star
- Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2000 16:50:01 -0300
- To: "vsnet-chat" <vsnet-chat@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp>, <vsnet-id@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
- From: "Sebastian Otero" <varsao@fullzero.com.ar>
- Subject: [vsnet-chat 3886] Info on a LMC star
- Cc: "AAVSO DISCUSSION" <aavso-discussion@informer2.cis.McMaster.CA>
- Sender: owner-vsnet-chat@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Dear friends:
Observing some variables in the LMC, I used one B spectral type star as a
comparison and then found that the published V values suggested variability
and furthermore, they had nothing to do with my observation...
When I looked for the star in the Tycho and Tycho 2 catalogues, I noticed
that there are two stars close from each other labelled with different names
but sharing some particular features:
Tycho recorded TYC 9167-00383-1, position 5h 39m 05.52s -69º 29' 22.5" , Vt
12.36 and B-V -0.49 ,
while Tycho 2 doesn't include that star but do include TYC 9167-00759-1 ,
position 5h 38m 58.85s -69º 29' 22.0" , Vt 11.72 and B-V -0.41
The Tycho Input Catalogue agrees with the Tycho 2 entry and gives a rough
9.8 V magnitude.
From Tycho numbers I see there is a great error, since a color index bluer
than -0.4 is impossible and the UBV measurements are +0.12.
Searching in the Washington Double Star catalogue, I found there is a double
star near the same position. Magnitudes mentioned are 10.8 and 12.8. It is
DM-69 468 which turns out to be HD 269927.
The question is: Is HD 269927 the same star as TYC 9167-00759-1 ?
And what is TYC 9167-00383-1? A mistake? Or both Tycho 1 and Tycho 2 stars
are the individual components of the WDSC pair?
At the time of my observation there was no other star that could be
misidentified nearby. At least not a 10 or 11 magnitude one.
Measurements:
V measurements in the GCPD are 10.96, B-V 0.12 and 10.64 (They are for the
AB pair, so it's supposedly the brighter I should be observing.) SIMBAD
lists the object as V= 10.69, B-V 0.11.
My observation last night is 10.3, comparing the star with nearby stars that
looked okay and with good PEP(V) values.
Some clarification?
Thanks,
Sebastian.
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://vsnet.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.219 / Virus Database: 103 - Release Date: 05/12/00
Return to Daisaku Nogami
vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp