What is the status of archival visual and photographic observations for variable stars from the published literature? I recently dug out about 200 observations of the red semiregular AI Aur, which is all but absent from the major databases. The visual series for this star by Beyer in the 1930s was used to produce the ephemeris given in the current GCVS (the period is correct by the way). A rough estimate suggests the amount of data "hidden" in the journals must be comparable to the combined AAVSO/AFOEV/VSOLJ/etc databases. But so far as I know very little (or none) of this is incorporated. Because it provides indispensable temporal coverage, it would seem to me that an effort should be made to get this stuff into machine-readable form in some agreed-upon format. Since many of the stars involved are relatively bright, getting the comparison sequences onto a common standard system is much easier now than in the past. \Brian