[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]
[vsnet-chat 3693] Re: attachments
- Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2000 02:23:22 +0900 (JST)
- To: vsnet-chat
- From: Taichi Kato <tkato>
- Subject: [vsnet-chat 3693] Re: attachments
- Sender: owner-vsnet-chat@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Re: [vsnet-chat 3688] attachments
> If you don't trust attachments delete the message before you open it or run
> it through your virus checker. How much effort is that? As for sending it to
> *another* vsnet list, it was sent to vsnet-sequence. Unfortunately, many of
> the observers who actually make observations of these stars have
> unsubscribed to everything but obs, chat, outburst and alert out of
> frustration with the heavy traffic the other lists created. So now chat,
> alert or outburst is the only way to reach them.
Well, this is not apparently correct. About 90% of vsnet-chat subscribers
are subscribed to vsnet-sequence. There are also a few "vsnet-sequence only"
subscribers. Posting to vsnet-sequence, and a few lines of comments other
necessary lists, is the most functioning way to distribute charts and
sequence to the different degree of necessity by observers, chart makers,
etc. The vsnet-chat subscribers are not always observers. They can be
theorists who want to discuss on variable star phenomena; for non-observers
(or non-optical observers) random collection of numbers like charts,
sequence and identification lists are almost useless. This is one of the
main reasons of list splits resulting in vsnet-chart, vsnet-id and
vsnet-sequence.
Regards
Taichi Kato
Return to Daisaku Nogami
vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp