As part of a general necessity on my part, and following on somewhat from an earlier theme, I have been in contact with Dr Norbert Zacharias who is a prime author of the UCAC1 release. His prompt and full response states that although he feels that: >>The ultimate identification will be based on >>position, however, that is why the "position" should be given >>in addition to the "name" when needed. he also affirms that: >>Bottom line, I encourage the use of "1UCACnnnnnnnn" names. It should also be noted that a joint name and co-ordinate scheme is part of IAU naming recommendations, as is the use of a "running number" naming route. the USNO pages have undergone another recent restructuring, so see: http://ad.usno.navy.mil/ucac/u1_readme.html for details of UCAC1 and its numbering convention. John