Apologies to all, I'm afraid this is another example of what bias can do to the visual observer. My false positive observation of V592 Her may have influenced my friend Maciej into "expecting" to see it in outburst. I believe this is one of the reasons the AAVSO has resisted posting notices of outbursts, historically. They have strived, since the beginning, to have their database, which until now has been based on visual observations primarily, remain pure and untainted by visual observations based on preconceived notions. Gene Hanson has written some very enlightening articles regarding working at the visual limit of your instrument and the evils of "bias" in visual observations. We have posted these as articles on our astronomy club's VSO website at- http://home.earthlink.net/~joevp/docs/rules.html and http://home.earthlink.net/~joevp/docs/glimpse.html In defense of my observations, (which my friends have let me know is now on shaky ground at best), I have realized that my false positives seem to happen most often on nights of exceptional clarity. I am suddenly seeing stars in familiar fields that I have not seen before, and sometimes these are mistaken for the variable. What can I say, after hundreds of negative observations of EG Cnc, if I think I see it, I get all excited! My final apologies go to those of you who have unsubscribed to the proliferation of vsnet-lists only to have three versions of this message reach your mailbox. Frankly, I just wasn't sure where to post this. Humbly yours, Mike Simonsen