Hi Arne and all, Interesting to hear about TASS. It would be good to see an R image, perhaps, but V and I are a great improvement on nothing! On to V382. It seems the problem in this area is between magnitudes 10 and 11 which is a difficult area for CCDs in that you're back to ordinary sequential photometry over a wide field. I don't really want to get involved in that. But if the weather ever clears I'll get a few BVR frames to help resolve the present problem. I must admit that Bruce's recent quietness led me to believe that the problem wasn't so great any more and that the photographic sequences were proving adequate. Apparently that is not so. I tried my hand at the 12-15 range earlier but without many results. You can either do sequences or CV monitoring, but in practice not both. I've been talking to the people in Auckland about getting images of other fields but that's probably two to four months away. I found that vignetting with the filters and the need to refocus (unfiltered and BVRI don't share the same focal plane) was a constant annoyance, as was the need to locate a series of new fields. Also, the cold emanating from the CCD area seemed to cause dewing on the filters. I now have a heater for these. But the next good night without a moon I'll try to catch up on some of the ones I promised earlier. There are not as many sets of BVRI filters in use as you might think amongst southern amateurs and not all owners have much background in filtered photometry. Without this background all you're doing is producing another set of poor comparisons. Also there is probably some reluctance to get involved in an area where another group is reputedly active. Most of the amateur photometrists have, in the past, produced UBV sequences down to V = 14 or more in southern VS fields. But many haven't seen the light of day - or night - yet. So most of us have given up sequences. I would like to see good charts for all southern CVs, or suspected CVs, and emailed Bruce about this earlier this year. It's a waste of time making sequences if they're not adopted by everyone. I'm submitting the proposal about the CV sequences to a group with an automatic 35cm telescope next month - whether they'll wish to produce charts as well is not clear. But with the much easier way to describe faint stars now it will be easy to publish results at intervals. Regards, Stan ---------- > From: aah@nofs.navy.mil > To: vsnet-chat@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp > Subject: [vsnet-chat 3355] Re: V382 Vel comparison stars > Date: Tuesday, July 04, 2000 9:50 PM > > Bruce Sumner asked when some group was going to do real > two color photometry of the sky. This must have been > a leading question, as I think Bruce knows that I am > involved in The Amateur Sky Survey (TASS). That survey > (using Droege's Mark IV cameras) is scheduled to begin > in September, covering initially the northern sky from > -30 to the pole in Johnson-Cousins V&I down to V=16. > There are several cameras in queue to head south and > complete the entire sky. So, within a year or two, there > should be both UCAC covering the entire sky for astrometry > and TASS covering about the same stars with photometry. > In the meantime, what are observers in the southern > hemisphere that have CCD systems doing with their equipment? > I know a few have photometric filters, but they don't seem > to be jumping at the opportunity to clear up some important > questions. > Arne