[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]
[vsnet-chat 3045] Re: [vsnet-obs 28140] RE: Reszelski's observation
- Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2000 15:12:52 +0900 (JST)
- To: vsnet-chat
- From: Taichi Kato <tkato>
- Subject: [vsnet-chat 3045] Re: [vsnet-obs 28140] RE: Reszelski's observation
- Sender: owner-vsnet-chat@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Re: [vsnet-chat 3041] Re: [vsnet-obs 28140] RE: Reszelski's observation
Lasse wrote:
> But an experienced observer using a dobsonian scope can easily observe
> 12 CV with 7 minutes.
> That's no problem if you know the star fields from thousands of previous
> observations.
> Of course it helps if the stars are in the same part of the sky.
>
> I guess observers like Gary Poyner and Gene Hanson often make
> observations that fast.
> I did the same when I observed visually using my 13.1 inch dobsonian.
Gary wrote:
> I've never managed 12 CV's in 7 mins. If they are in the same part of
> the sky and visible then one per minute is easy. Not constantly referring to
> charts saves time. HOwever I'm getting old now (42 soon), so two minutes
> per observation is about average for me. Lasse I know was a fast -AND
> accurate observer. Pity we lost him to CCD really. Gene Hanson has to
> observe quickly, as he always has one eye open for Scorpions and rattle
> snakes :-)
CV observers are just like doing "Messier marathon" every night ;-).
The point I was surprized at Reszelski's observation was the very faint
limiting magnitude compared to the speed of observation. [Does anyone
know the established relation/record between them?] I could manage to
observe two CVs per minute to a limiting magnitude of 13.5 (using a
classical 20-cm SCT, at a fixed magnification of x160), but would have
never done as quickly to a limiting magnitude of 14.5-15.0. I wonder how
quickly these "super-observers" locate the fields and change magnifications
to accomodate these faint variables.
However, I wonder how quicker Reszelski could observe if he could manage
to sleep more than four hours ;-). Well, how frequently have I heard
of observers whose single "sleeping sessions" never exceeding two hours...
I suspect Patrick Schmeer is extremely talented in this regard; considering
the quick response in day and night, I suppose he never sleeps
continuously ;-)
Regards,
Taichi Kato
Return to Daisaku Nogami
vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp