[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]
[vsnet-chat 3042] Re: ETA CARINAE - Two years of observations
- Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2000 18:32:31 -0400 (EDT)
- To: vsnet-chat@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
- From: Bish Ishibashi <bish@howdy.gsfc.nasa.gov>
- Subject: [vsnet-chat 3042] Re: ETA CARINAE - Two years of observations
- Sender: owner-vsnet-chat@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Howdy all,
Harry's measurements show a dispersion of +/- 0.04mag
in its astronomical magnitude. Considering that the recent
change in astronomical magnitude is only about 0.03 mag. in his
measurements, I am *not yet* convinced that this is a real
declining trend. On top of that, the value of B-V seems to
decline down to 0.65 annually. Now you all know "Occam's Razor":
the simplest explanation for this recent change still appears
to be color-effect due to its high airmass because of its apparent
repeatability in an annual timescale.
The point I am making here is the same as the one Stan made:
[Eta] is a very difficult visual object. If one wants to asertain
the existence of any type of a trend, the trend has to be
"statistically significant", i.e., the degree of the change should
be much larger than sysmetic variation of an observer's measurement.
For that reason I can't say that any recent data I've seen so far
(including our own with the HST) suggest a strong short-term decline
in Eta's brightness.
Of course, it does NOT say the declining trend has to be
spurious (Ah, a wonder of statistics), and all the folks down
under have a chance to prove me wrong by continuing visual
monitoring of Eta Car as many days, months and years as you
can persist :-). To say the least, in a few months from now
we should have a verdict on this business.
Cheers and have fun observing,
Bish Ishibashi
PS. The recent brightening does not really fit to a so-called
"S-Doradous" phase, either. During a normal "SD-phase,"
bolometric luminosity remains roughly constant but
shifts toward longer wavelengths as the photospheric
radius expands. Davidson et al. (1999) demonstrated
that the increase in luminosity was much rapid in
shorter wavelengths, i.e., Eta was becoming bluer than
usual. This is an exact opposite of what we expect
from an usual eruption of LBV stars. For more, Please
refer to Davidson et al. (if you do not have an access
to ApJ, then ftp colossus.gsfc.nasa.gov, and login as
"anonymous" and the usual blah blah to get in, and then
do a "cd pub/bish/" & "get preprint4.ps" or "get preprint4.pdf"
- if pdf, don't forget to type "binary" before download -
to obtain the original draft of the paper.)
PS2. And lastly, Sebastian, Eta Car is tremendously bright
in H-alpha emission line; and H-alpha emission is effectively
scattered around by the reflection nebula surrounding the star.
This fact makes Eta Car very unusually "red" to the human eyes
while the value of B-V -- remember, a true "V" transmission
does not include much of H-alpha emission line -- is not
reflecting the peculiar nature.
Return to Daisaku Nogami
vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp