[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]
[vsnet-chat 1986] (fwd) Re: V735 Sgr (from Samus)
- Date: Thu, 17 Jun 1999 17:15:19 +0900 (JST)
- To: vsnet-chat
- From: Taichi Kato <tkato>
- Subject: [vsnet-chat 1986] (fwd) Re: V735 Sgr (from Samus)
- Sender: owner-vsnet-chat@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 1999 12:03:06 +0400 (MSD)
From: "Nikolai N. Samus" <samus@sai.msu.ru>
Subject: Re: V735 Sgr
Dear Dr. Kato,
The first page of the paper "Variable Stars in MWF 189", by Henrietta H.
Swope (Harvard Obs. Annals, Vol. 109, No. 1) has the following footnote:
"Among Luyten's variables (Minn. Publ., 2, 102-104) there are seven that,
from the published positions, should fall in this region, but the right
ascensions are in error by an hour. Dr. Luyten has written me that instead
of 17 hours the right ascensions should read 16 hours, and that the stars
are thus identical with previosly known variables, as shown below:
H.V.9126=AE Sco H.V.9182=EU Oph H.V.9199=FN Oph
9147=KX Oph 9196=FK Oph 9200=FL Oph
9180=ER Oph "
Best regards
Kolya
On Thu, 17 Jun 1999, Taichi Kato wrote:
> Dear Prof. Samus,
>
> > The nearly one hour error in Luyten's coordinates for these stars.
>
> Was this one hour error mentioned in Harvard Annals, or somewhere else?
> (Sorry, I don't have access to these literatures).
>
> Regards,
> Taichi Kato
>
Return to Daisaku Nogami
vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp