[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]
[vsnet-chat 1686] CW Mon
- Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 15:26:51 -0600 (CST)
- To: vsnet-chat@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
- From: Ron Webbink <webbink@astro.uiuc.edu>
- Subject: [vsnet-chat 1686] CW Mon
- Sender: owner-vsnet-chat@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
In regard to the discrepancy in coordinates for CW Mon between DWS (Downes,
Webbink & Shara) and USNO-A2.0, these can be laid to differences in the
reference frames.
Except as noted below, the coordinates listed by DWS were measured on the
digitized Guide Star Survey plates, and are in the astrometric reference
system of GSC1.0 and GSC1.1. The source plates are identified in the column
labeled "Coord Ref" in Table 1 of DWS, by a four-character ID (beginning
with 0); details (plate centers, exposure dates, emulsions, etc.) of the
Guide Star Survey plates can be found in Lasker, et al. 1990, AJ, 90, 2019.
Notations in "Coord Ref" which do not conform to this four-character format
identify other sources from the literature (Table 4); we did not remeasure
these stars.
The GSC reference frame is known to have significant local systematic errors.
These are reflected in the difference between the positions for this star
in the USNO-A1.0 catalog (which is tied to the GSC reference frame) and the
USNO-A2.0 catalog (which is derived, I believe, from the same plate digitiza-
tion as the A1.0 catalog, but tied to the Hipparcos frame):
DWS 06 36 54.526 +00 02 16.32
USNO-A1.0 0900-03187401 06 36 54.477 +00 02 16.63
USNO-A2.0 0900-03178341 06 36 54.547 +00 02 17.69
Note that applying the difference between USNO-A2.0 and A1.0 positions to the
DWS coordinates gives almost precisely those measured by Arne Henden (vsnet-
chat 1684):
Henden 06 36 54.59 +00 02 17.4
In fact, if one arranges the AC2000 coordinates (which are tied to the
Hipparcos frame), USNO-A2.0, corrected DWS, and Henden coordinates in
chronological order, it appears that the remaining discrepancies (to the
extent that they are statistically significant) can be laid to a small, but
nonzero proper motion:
RA(J2000) Dec(J2000) Epoch
AC2000 48063 06 36 54.465 +00 02 17.42 1909.08
USNO-A2.0 0900-03178341 06 36 54.547 +00 02 17.69 1955.88
DWS 06 36 54.596 +00 02 17.38 1984.18
Henden 06 36 54.59 +00 02 17.4 1999.2
At a distance of ~300 pc, this would make the transverse velocity of CW Mon
relative to the Sun a mundane ~35 km/s.
Ron Webbink
Return to Daisaku Nogami
vsnet-adm@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp