UPDATED COMPARISON STAR SEQUENCE FOR U SCORPII Following comments from several observers, I have amended my comparison star sequence for U Scorpii (ref. vsnet-chat 1667, vsnet-alert 2724 and AAVSO-DIS 1 March 1999). I have extended the sequence to very faint limits, which will only assist CCD observers, corrected the declination of the 13.74 star, and more importantly, deleted several stars which were not necessary, or too red, for the sequence. In particular, I have deleted the bright double star, 12.565 and 12.730, from the sequence, as being separated by only 25arcsec, they may have proven difficult to use in the field. The resulting final sequence is however as compact, complete and as unambiguous as it can be made. Note that star 1 is Bjorn Granslo's 'D' and star 2 is 'E' (ref. vsnet 1777) There is a definite inconsistency between the Tycho magnitudes and Menzies magnitudes of these two stars. I would favour the Menzies values (as given here), but this is my opinion only, we need new BV photometry to resolve the issue. Any takers? I wish to thank Arne Henden for the CCD field photometry from which most of this sequence is derived. ___________________________________________________________________________ U SCORPII (NR) Range: 8.0-18.5V 16 22 30.779 -17 52 42.94 Magnitude in .dat file: V=18.510 B-V=0.459 ID RA (2000) DEC X Y N V ERR B-V ERR Adopted v 1 16 23 16.1 -17 50 15 648 150 10.61 10.6 2 16 22 25.8 -18 02 59 -72 -616 10.94 10.9 3 16 22 54.0 -17 45 08 332 454 11.53 11.5 4 16 22 45.8 -17 51 52 214 51 3 12.588 0.005 1.238 0.003 12.6 5 16 22 46.5 -17 57 01 224 -258 3 12.783 0.000 0.795 0.007 12.8 6 16 22 44.4 -17 47 32 194 311 3 13.167 0.005 0.641 0.008 13.2 7 16 22 31.7 -18 01 13 14 -510 13.74 13.7 8 16 22 11.9 -17 57 33 -270 -290 3 14.286 0.009 0.870 0.014 14.3 9 16 22 29.2 -17 54 50 -23 -127 3 14.628 0.005 1.168 0.002 14.6 10 16 22 38.9 -17 56 51 115 -248 3 14.751 0.005 0.967 0.009 14.8 11 16 22 36.8 -17 51 55 86 48 3 15.098 0.006 0.837 0.006 15.1 12 16 22 27.5 -17 54 15 -47 -92 3 15.494 0.016 0.818 0.015 15.5 13 16 22 25.6 -17 51 34 -75 69 3 15.863 0.006 1.120 0.015 15.9 14 16 22 22.2 -17 52 40 -123 3 3 16.090 0.006 0.806 0.023 16.1 15 16 22 36.2 -17 51 22 77 81 3 16.383 0.016 0.863 0.020 16.4 16 16 22 31.8 -17 53 52 14 -69 3 16.635 0.023 0.822 0.032 16.6 17 16 22 29.2 -17 52 19 -22 24 3 16.697 0.019 0.856 0.038 16.7 18 16 22 27.9 -17 51 32 -41 71 3 16.918 0.009 0.791 0.009 16.9 19 16 22 27.1 -17 53 57 -53 -74 3 17.293 0.033 0.827 0.019 17.3 20 16 22 32.5 -17 54 23 24 -100 3 17.481 0.058 0.841 0.072 17.5 21 16 22 37.3 -17 53 03 92 -20 3 17.978 0.039 1.273 0.017 18.0 22 16 22 30.2 -17 53 01 -9 -18 3 18.491 0.103 0.620 0.135 18.5 ___________________________________________________________________________ Note that positive X and positive Y offsets are north & east respectively. Bruce Sumner